Key Points:
- Attorney John Morgan revealed that a lawyer at his firm improperly used AI, resulting in the citation of eight fictional legal cases in a legal brief.
- This incident serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of relying solely on artificial intelligence for legal work.
- The use of AI without proper verification can lead to significant errors in important documents.
Executive Summary:
Attorney John Morgan’s firm, Morgan & Morgan, experienced a major setback when a lawyer cited eight non-existent cases in a legal brief, solely relying on AI for research. This incident highlights the risks associated with trusting AI technology without human oversight, underscoring the need for careful verification in legal practices.
12ft.io Link: https://12ft.io/https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2025/02/25/ai-chatbot-fail-morgan-morgan-chatgpt/
Archive.org Link: https://web.archive.org/web/https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2025/02/25/ai-chatbot-fail-morgan-morgan-chatgpt/
Original Link: https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2025/02/25/ai-chatbot-fail-morgan-morgan-chatgpt/
User Message: @Scott_Maxwell
“One of our lawyers relied solely on A.I. and f***ed up.”
Attorney John Morgan explains how his firm filed a legal brief that cited 8 cases that don’t actually exist.
A cringe-inducing, cautionary tale about blindly relying on artificial intelligence.
for more on see the post on bypassing methods